Today’s testimony comes from Birmingham, where 27-year-old British Pakistani Amir, choosing anonymity to safeguard his new faith, once lived with deep-seated hatred from his Muslim past.

The killing of Charlie Kirk changed everything, unsettling his hollow life with a profound Jesus encounter, sparking a journey that risks all he holds dear.

What light broke through his darkness? Prepare for his powerful testimony and story. My name is Amir Hussein.

I am 27 years old and until 7 days ago, I was a Muslim who had never questioned the hatred I carried in my heart.

Today I write as a man whose soul has been turned inside out by the life and faith of a man I had been taught to despise.

But let me start at the beginning because you need to understand how deep the roots of hatred can grow when they’re planted in childhood and watered with family approval.

I was born in Birmingham to parents who had arrived from Lahore with dreams of a better life and hearts heavy with the weight of what they’d left behind.

My father Rasheed worked double shifts at a textile factory while my mother Fatima cleaned offices at night to make ends meet.

They were good people in many ways. Hard-working, devoted to family, generous with neighbors. But they carried something else across the ocean with them.

A worldview that divided humanity into us and them, believers and enemies. Our small terrace house on Alam Rock Road became a gathering place for men from our community every Friday after prayers.

The living room would fill with the smell of cardamom tea and the sound of erdo mixed with heavily accented English as my father’s friends uncles by courtesy if not blood settled into worn sofas and mismatched chairs.

I was perhaps eight or nine when I first remember sitting quietly in the corner trying to make sense of their passionate conversations about politics and current events.

The topics were always the same. The injustices in Palestine, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the growing hostility they felt from British society.

They would discuss various Western politicians and media figures with anger and disgust, teaching me early who our enemies supposedly were.

It wasn’t until around 2019 or 2020 when I was in my early 20s that I began hearing a new name mentioned with particular venom in these family gatherings.

Charlie Kirk had become a prominent media figure with his podcast and radio show, and his criticism of Islamic extremism and concerns about Muslim immigration had caught the attention of our community leaders.

By then, Kirk was gaining significant influence through his daily radio show and growing media presence.

The way my father and uncles spoke about him, you would have thought he was personally responsible for every act of discrimination Muslims faced in the West.

They painted him as a dangerous young voice poisoning an entire generation of Americans against Islam.

Even now, remembering those evenings from my late teens and early 20s makes my chest tight with shame.

The way my uncle Tariq would lean forward in his chair, his voice dropping to an angry whisper when he mentioned Kirk’s name.

The way my father’s jaw would clench, his hands forming fists on his knees. The way the room would fill with murmurss of agreement when someone shared the latest outrageous thing Kirk had supposedly said about Muslims.

I absorbed it all like a sponge. At that age, 18, 19, 20, you don’t question the adults you love and respect, especially when their anger seems so justified.

When your father tells you someone is dangerous, when your uncles nod gravely as they discuss how this young American is spreading lies about your faith.

When your community is united in their condemnation, you simply accept it as truth. Why would you question it?

The picture they painted was clear and consistent. Charlie Kirk, this young conservative fire brand barely older than myself, was an Islamophobe of the worst kind.

He called Islam a religion of conquest. They said he warned that Muslim immigration was destroying Western civilization.

He spread fear and hatred wherever he went, turning good Christian people against their Muslim neighbors.

He was, in their words, an enemy of everything we believed in. But here’s the thing that haunts me now.

Even after Kirk became a prominent figure in our community’s discussions around 2019 2020, I never once heard these words from Kirk himself.

Every opinion I formed, every surge of anger I felt when his name came up, every time I rolled my eyes or felt my stomach clench with disgust, it was all based on secondhand information, WhatsApp messages forwarded through community groups, headlines from articles I never read beyond the first paragraph, clips taken out of context and shared with outraged commentary.

I remember being in my early 20s and seeing a meme on my cousin’s phone that mocked something Kirk had supposedly said.

I laughed along with everyone else, feeling proud that I understood why it was funny, why this young American deserved our ridicule.

I felt included in the righteous anger of my elders, validated in my inherited hatred.

The irony is painful now. I spent about 5 years from around 2020 through this past week despising a man whose actual words I had never heard, whose actual beliefs I had never investigated, whose actual character I had never examined for myself.

I was like someone who hates a book based only on what others have told them it says, never bothering to read it for themselves.

This is how hatred propagates, I realize now. Not through careful study and reason disagreement, but through lazy acceptance of what we’re told by people we trust.

It passes from generation to generation like a family recipe. A pinch of this rumor, a dash of that headline, seasoned with righteous indignation and served up as unquestionable truth.

My early 20s were marinated in this inherited hostility. I went to a predominantly Muslim secondary school where our shared grievances were reinforced daily.

Teachers would sometimes reference current events in ways that confirmed our community’s world view. Friends would share the latest inflammatory quote attributed to someone who spoke about Islam and Muslims, and we’d shake our heads together in disgust.

It wasn’t just Kirk, of course. There was a whole roster of names that could reliably provoke the same response in our circles.

Politicians, commentators, authors, anyone who had ever criticized Islam or expressed concerns about Muslim immigration found themselves on our informal enemies list.

But Kirk seemed to occupy a special place in our collective anger. Perhaps because he was young like us, because he was seen as particularly influential among American conservatives, or simply because his name had become shorthand for everything we opposed.

I remember family weddings where conversations would inevitably turn political and Kirk’s name would come up like a reliable villain in a familiar story.

Cousins from London or Manchester would share the latest outrage, and we’d all nod knowingly, our faces set in expressions of righteous disapproval.

It felt good in a way to be part of something larger than ourselves, to share in this communal anger, to know exactly who the bad guys were.

The comfortable certainty of it all is what strikes me now. How easy it was to hate someone I’d never listened to, never tried to understand, never given the benefit of the doubt.

How satisfying it felt to have clear enemies, simple explanations for complex problems, righteous anger that required no actual knowledge or investigation.

I went to university at Birmingham City to study business. And even there, surrounded by people from different backgrounds, the pattern continued.

In the Islamic society, Kirk’s name would come up during discussions about Islamophobia in Western media.

We’d cite him as an example of the kind of hatred Muslims face, the kind of prejudice we had to overcome.

I probably mentioned his name dozens of times to non-Muslim classmates, always as an example of bigotry, always with complete confidence in my assessment.

But I had never, not once, actually listened to Charlie Kirk speak for more than a few seconds of a decontextualized clip.

By the time I finished university and started working at an accounting firm in Birmingham city center, this hatred had become as natural to me as breathing.

It was part of my identity, woven into my understanding of the world. Charlie Kirk was the enemy.

End of story. No further investigation required. I lived in a comfortable bubble of confirmation bias, surrounded by people who shared my views and consuming media that reinforced what I already believed.

Social media algorithms fed me exactly what they thought I wanted to see. More reasons to be angry at people like Kirk.

More evidence of the threats facing Muslims in the West. More fuel for the fire of inherited hatred.

Looking back, I can see how this mindset shaped everything about how I understood current events, politics, even my own faith.

I was a Muslim, not just because I believed in Allah and followed the five pillars, but because I was part of a community under siege, fighting against enemies like Charlie Kirk, who wanted to destroy us.

My identity was as much about who I opposed as who I supported. The saddest part is how this hatred made me smaller, not larger.

Instead of encouraging me to engage with different ideas, to challenge myself intellectually, to grow in wisdom and understanding, it created walls around my mind.

I knew what I was supposed to think about certain people and topics and I never ventured beyond those boundaries.

My family was proud of my political awareness, my ability to articulate our community’s positions on various issues.

When relatives visited from Pakistan, they’d nod approvingly as I explained the challenges facing Muslims in Britain, the media bias we encountered, the political figures who opposed us.

I felt knowledgeable, sophisticated, righteously informed, but I wasn’t informed at all. I was indoctrinated.

There’s a difference between knowledge and ideology, between understanding and assumption. I had confused having strong opinions with being well-informed, mistaken passion for insight.

This is the soil in which my hatred of Charlie Kirk grew for nearly two decades.

Rich soil fertilized by family approval and community solidarity watered regularly with fresh outrages and new reasons for anger.

By the time I was 27, that hatred felt as natural and unquestionable as my own name.

I thought I knew exactly who Charlie Kirk was and what he represented. I was certain he was an enemy of everything I held dear, a spreader of lies and hatred, a danger to people like me and my family.

I could not have been more wrong. But to understand how completely wrong I was and how dramatically my life changed when I discovered the truth.

You need to know what happened on September 10th, 2025. The day the man I had been taught to hate was fatally shot during an event at Utah Valley University.

September 10th started like any other Wednesday. I woke up at 7:30 to the sound of my alarm, performed my morning prayers as I had every day for as long as I could remember, and prepared for another ordinary day at the accounting firm where I’d worked for the past 3 years.

The September morning was crisp with that particular quality of early autumn light that makes everything seem sharper, more defined.

I lived alone in a small flat in Sparkbrook, not far from the mosque I attended for Friday prayers and the extended family gatherings that still punctuated my weeks.

My daily routine was comfortable and predictable. Work, gym, dinner, a bit of television or time scrolling through social media before bed.

I was single, much to my mother’s constant concern, focused on building my career and saving money for a house deposit.

The morning commute was typical. Crowded bus, the familiar faces of regular passengers, the mix of languages that characterized Birmingham’s beautiful diversity.

I had my earbuds in listening to a podcast about cryptocurrency, trying to stay current with financial trends that might help my clients.

The world felt normal, stable, predictable. The workday passed uneventfully with the usual mix of client meetings and paperwork.

But it was around 7:30 in the evening during my commute home on the crowded bus when everything changed.

I was scrolling through my phone, half listening to the podcast still playing in my earbuds when a flood of notifications lit up my screen.

Yasin, my colleague from the cubicle next to mine, had texted me a link with a single word, WTF.

I opened it and felt my stomach drop. The news had broken just minutes earlier.

Charlie Kirk had been shot during an event at a university in America. The details were still emerging, but the basic facts were clear enough.

Kirk had been speaking at Utah Valley University when a young man opened fire from a rooftop at around 12:23 p.m.

Local time. Kirk was rushed to a hospital but was pronounced dead later that evening.

The shooter’s whereabouts were unknown with reports of a manhunt underway. My first reaction, I’m ashamed to admit, was a strange sort of satisfaction.

Not celebration exactly, but a sense that something inevitable had finally occurred. This was the man I’d been taught to see as an enemy of my people after all.

Someone who had spent years in my understanding spreading hatred against Muslims. Part of me felt that he had reaped what he had sown.

But even in that first moment, something felt wrong about my reaction. There was a hollowess to it, a sense that I should feel differently than I did.

I couldn’t quite identify what was bothering me, but there was a discomfort beneath the surface satisfaction.

The news had spread throughout Birmingham’s Muslim community like wildfire. My phone was buzzing constantly with WhatsApp messages from family members, friends from university, people from the mosque.

The tone of these messages varied, but there was a common thread, a sense that justice had somehow been served.

My uncle Tariq sent a message to our family group chat that simply said, “Allah’s justice comes for all oppressors.”

Several people responded with prayer emojis and expressions of agreement. My cousin in London shared a link to a news article with the comment, “One less Islamophobe in the world.”

The meme started almost immediately. Screenshots of news headlines with laughing emojis. Jokes about karma catching up with Kirk.

References to him getting what he deserved for spreading hatred. The speed with which these appeared, the eagerness with which people shared them should have made me uncomfortable.

But at the time, I found myself forwarding some of them, adding my own comments, participating in what felt like a communitywide expression of satisfaction.

The evening brought family dinner at my parents’ house, a weekly tradition that had continued even after I moved out.

The conversation was dominated by discussion of Kirk’s death. My father and uncles were more subdued than I had expected, but there was an unmistakable undertone of satisfaction in their voices as they discussed the news.

They talked about it as they might discuss the death of any enemy, with somnity, but also with a sense that the world was now a marginally better place.

Someone mentioned that Kirk’s family would be grieving, and there were murmurss about feeling sorry for them, but these expressions of sympathy felt peruncter, obligatory rather than heartfelt.

What struck me most was how quickly the conversation moved from Kirk’s death to broader political topics.

It was as if his assassination was simply another data point in our ongoing narrative about the hostility Muslims faced in the West.

Another example of how violence begets violence. There was no real engagement with the tragedy of what had happened.

No serious reflection on the loss of human life. I went home that evening feeling strangely empty.

The satisfaction I had initially felt was gone, replaced by something I couldn’t quite name.

I found myself thinking about Kirk’s family, his wife, his children, if he had any, his parents.

Whatever I thought of his politics, surely they were devastated by his loss. Surely they were experiencing the kind of grief that transcends political disagreements.

But it was more than sympathy for his family that was bothering me. There was something about the celebration itself that felt wrong.

Something about the speed with which people had moved from shock to satisfaction to outright mockery.

I tried to push these feelings aside to remind myself of all the reasons Kirk deserved no sympathy from people like me.

The next few days brought a parade of commentary from within my community. Social media was full of posts analyzing Kirk’s death, debating its significance, sharing conspiracy theories about who was really behind it.

Some suggested it was a false flag operation designed to make Muslims look bad. Others claimed it was divine justice for his years of spreading hatred.

What bothered me most were the memes and jokes that continued to circulate, images of Kirk with mock epitaps, videos set to celebratory music, comment sections filled with laughing emojis and expressions of satisfaction.

The sheer gleefulness of it all began to make me physically uncomfortable. I found myself thinking about a Quranic verse I had memorized as a child.

And whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption in the land, it is as if he had slain mankind entirely.

The verse speaks about the sanctity of life. About how taking a life unjustly is one of the gravest sins.

But somehow in all the commentary I was seeing from my community, this fundamental principle seemed forgotten.

By the weekend, I was actively avoiding the WhatsApp groups where Kirk’s death was still being discussed.

The jokes had gotten darker, the celebration more explicit. Someone had shared a video compilation of what they claimed were Kirk’s most offensive statements about Islam set to mocking music.

Watching it made me feel sick to my stomach. I started questioning my own reactions.

Why wasn’t I celebrating like everyone else? Why did the jokes feel cruel rather than clever?

Why did I keep thinking about Kirk’s family? About the man himself as a human being rather than just as a political symbol.

Part of me wondered if I was being too sensitive, if I was losing touch with the righteous anger that had always been such a central part of my identity.

My family and friends seemed so certain in their reactions, so comfortable with their satisfaction at Kirk’s death.

Maybe the problem was with me, not with them. But the discomfort persisted and grew.

I found myself thinking about death more generally, about what it means for a life to end, about the finality and tragedy of violent death regardless of politics.

I thought about my own mortality, about how I would want to be remembered, about whether anyone deserved to die for their political opinions.

These thoughts were new for me. Throughout my life, I had been comfortable with clear distinctions between good and evil, us and them, friends and enemies.

The idea that someone could be wrong about important things and still deserve basic human dignity, was not something I had seriously considered.

But Kirk’s death was forcing me to confront these questions whether I wanted to or not.

Days after the shooting, the jokes were starting to fade from social media, but they were being replaced by something else that bothered me even more.

Detailed discussions of Kirk’s supposed crimes, cataloges of his offensive statements, arguments about why his death was actually a good thing for the world.

It was as if my community was working to retroactively justify their celebration to convince themselves that they were right to feel satisfied about what had happened.

I found myself growing more and more isolated from these conversations. When relatives or friends brought up Kirk’s death, I would nod along but contribute little to the discussion.

The enthusiastic agreement I had shown initially was gone, replaced by an uncomfortable silence that I hoped others wouldn’t notice.

But they did notice. My cousin Asia asked me directly why I seemed so quiet whenever Kirk came up in conversation.

My uncle Tariq made a joke about me going soft in my old age. Even my mother commented that I seemed distracted, less engaged than usual during family dinners.

I couldn’t explain to them what I couldn’t fully understand myself. All I knew was that something about my community’s reaction to Kirk’s death felt wrong, felt inconsistent with the values of compassion and justice that I thought Islam taught.

But I also couldn’t shake the feeling that maybe I was the one who was wrong.

That maybe my discomfort was a sign of weakness rather than moral clarity. It was in this state of confusion and growing isolation that curiosity began to take hold of me.

If Kirk really was everything my family and community said he was, if he really deserved the hatred we had directed toward him for so many years, then why did I feel so uncomfortable about celebrating his death?

Why did the jokes and memes make me feel sick rather than satisfied? There was only one way to find out.

I realized for the first time in my life, I would have to actually listen to Charlie Kirk himself.

I would have to move beyond the secondhand information, the taken out of context clips, the community consensus, and hear what this man had actually said and believed.

I had no idea that this decision would change everything about my life, my faith, and my understanding of the world.

I had no idea that the man I had been taught to hate would become the instrument of my spiritual transformation.

I had no idea that discovering the depth of his faith would echo in my heart for days, drawing me toward a truth I had never imagined.

All I knew was that I needed to understand why I felt so empty about his death when everyone around me felt so satisfied.

The answer to that question would turn my world upside down. The laptop screen glowed in the darkness of my bedroom at 2:00 in the morning.

I had been lying awake for hours, unable to shake the restlessness that had been growing in me all week.

The house was completely silent except for the soft hum of the refrigerator in the kitchen and the occasional sound of a car passing on the street below.

I told myself I was just satisfying curiosity. After days of feeling increasingly uncomfortable with my community’s celebration of Charlie Kirk’s death, I needed to understand what all the hatred had been about.

I needed to confirm what I had always believed, that Kirk was indeed the Islamophobic bigot my family had described, that the years of anger directed toward him had been justified.

I expected to find exactly what I had been told I would find. Hateful rhetoric, anti-Muslim bigotry, the kind of content that would make me feel better about the community’s reaction to his death.

I was prepared to watch for a few minutes, confirm my assumptions, and go to bed with my world view intact.

But that’s not what happened. The first video I found was a speech Kirk had given at a university just a few months before his death.

The title was something about defending free speech on college campuses. I clicked on it with a mixture of anticipation and dread, expecting to hear the familiar talking points about Muslim immigration and Islamic conquest that had been described to me so many times.

Instead, I heard something completely different. Kirk was passionate. Yes, he spoke with intensity and conviction, but the hatred I had been expecting wasn’t there.

He talked about freedom, about the importance of being able to discuss difficult topics without fear, about his love for America and its founding principles.

When he mentioned Islam at all, it was in the context of broader discussions about religious freedom and the need for honest conversations about different worldviews.

I watched the entire 40inut speech, waiting for the moment when he would reveal himself to be the bigot I had been told he was.

It never came. Instead, I heard a young man who seemed genuinely concerned about the direction of his country, who spoke with obvious love for the principles he believed in, who seemed motivated by conviction rather than hatred.

But it was what happened next that really shook me. The algorithm suggested another video.

This one titled Charlie Kirk on faith and politics. I almost didn’t click on it.

Faith wasn’t what I had come to investigate. But something made me hesitate. Made me wonder what this man I had hated for so long actually believed about God.

What I heard in that video changed everything. Kirk spoke about Jesus Christ with a passion and conviction that was unlike anything I had ever encountered.

Not the ritualistic mentions of God that politicians often make. Not the casual Christianity that treats faith as cultural tradition, but the deep personal devotion of someone who had encountered the living God and been transformed by that encounter.

He talked about Jesus not just as a historical figure or moral teacher, but as Lord and Savior, as God incarnate, as the source of meaning and purpose in his life.

The way he spoke about Christ was so genuine, so heartfelt, so completely authentic that it was impossible to dismiss as performance or manipulation.

I found myself watching video after video, speeches where Kirk wo his faith seamlessly into his political commentary, interviews where he explained how his relationship with Jesus informed his world view, sermons he had given at churches and Christian events where he spoke with the passion of someone who had been genuinely transformed by the gospel.

This was not the man I had been taught to hate. This was not the shallow bigot of my community’s imagination.

This was someone who had wrestled with deep questions about life and meaning and had found answers that gave him purpose and direction.

Whether I agreed with his politics or not, I could not deny the authenticity of his faith or the sincerity of his convictions.

But it was the footage from the Utah Valley University event that I watched next that shattered every assumption I had ever held about Charlie Kirk and set in motion the spiritual earthquake that would reshape my entire life.

Someone had uploaded phone footage from the event where Kirk had been shot. I hesitated before clicking on it, knowing that I was about to witness a man’s final moments.

But I felt compelled to see for myself what had happened, to confront the end of a life I had spent so many years hating from a distance.

The video was shaky, clearly filmed by someone in the audience with their phone. Kirk was in the middle of his speech when the single shot rang out from somewhere above.

He slumped in his chair, clutching his neck as chaos erupted. People screaming, security rushing the stage.

Medics arrived quickly and he was carried away to an ambulance. Watching that raw footage, seeing the sudden violence and the immediate response to save his life hit me like a physical blow.

Kirk didn’t have time for any grand declaration in those frantic seconds, but the tragedy of it all.

The way his life was cut short in an instant forced me to confront the reality of who he was.

The man I had despised had been a devoted follower of Jesus, living out his faith publicly every day.

And now he was gone, leaving behind a family and a legacy I had never bothered to understand.

I sat in the darkness of my bedroom, tears streaming down my face, feeling as if the ground had shifted beneath me.

Everything I thought I knew about Charlie Kirk, everything I had believed about his character and motivations, everything I had accepted about who deserved hatred and who deserved sympathy, all of it crumbled in the face of the life he had actually lived.

How could I have hated someone whose faith was so deep, so real, so unshakable that it defined everything he did?

How could I have celebrated the shooting of a man whose public life was a testament to his devotion to Christ?

How could I have been so completely, utterly wrong about someone I had never even bothered to understand?

But it was more than just shame and regret that I felt in that moment.

It was something deeper, something that scared me more than I wanted to admit. Kirk’s unwavering commitment to Jesus, evident in every sermon and interview I had just watched, wasn’t just a personal belief.

It was a challenge directed straight at my heart. If Christ was indeed Lord as Kirk had proclaimed throughout his life with such conviction, then what did that mean for me?

What did that mean for my faith, my family, my entire understanding of God and salvation and eternal life?

What did that mean for everything I had been taught to believe about Jesus as merely a prophet, about Islam as the final revelation, about my own standing before God?

I tried to push these questions away to tell myself that Kirk’s death had been tragic, but that it didn’t change anything fundamental about reality or truth.

But the questions wouldn’t leave me alone. They echoed in my mind with the same persistence as the image of Kirk slumping on that stage.

Say demanding answers I wasn’t sure I was ready to give. Over the next several days, I found myself consumed with thoughts about what I had witnessed in those videos.

I would be at work trying to focus on spreadsheets and tax calculations when suddenly I would hear Kirk’s voice in my memory speaking about Jesus as Lord and Savior with such passion and conviction that it took my breath away.

I started having dreams about that footage. Sometimes I was in the audience watching it happen.

Sometimes I was on the stage with Kirk. Sometimes I was imagining the shooter’s perspective.

I would wake up sweating, my heart pounding, unable to shake the image of a man so confident in his faith that he had dedicated his life to proclaiming it.

The contrast between Kirk’s lifelong witness to his faith and the reaction of my community became more and more stark to me.

While he had lived every day demonstrating the kind of faith that shapes a life, we were celebrating his death with jokes and memes.

While he had been motivated by love for God and country, we were reing in what we thought was the defeat of an enemy.

I began to feel ashamed, not just of my previous hatred for Kirk, but of my entire community’s response to his death.

How could we call ourselves people of faith while celebrating the violent death of someone whose only crime was disagreeing with our political positions?

How could we claim to follow a religion of peace and mercy while mocking the grief of a dead man’s family?

But underneath the shame was something else. Something that frightened me even more. A growing conviction that Kirk’s life and faith weren’t just the story of a misguided man, but a declaration of truth that demanded a response from everyone who encountered it.

If Jesus Christ really was the Lord of the universe, the son of God, the savior of humanity, as Kirk had lived and died believing, then everything else in my life was suddenly up for questioning.

My faith in Islam, my relationship with my family, my understanding of salvation and eternal life, everything.

I tried to dismiss these thoughts as the product of emotional manipulation, as the result of being shocked by witnessing a man’s death.

I told myself that Kirk’s sincere faith didn’t make his beliefs true, that people could live with great conviction for false ideas, that the passion in his words didn’t prove anything about the reality of Christian claims.

But the arguments felt hollow even to me. There had been something about Kirk’s life, about the absolute certainty in his voice as he proclaimed Christ as Lord, that went beyond mere human conviction.

It felt like a truth so fundamental that it could shine through, even in the reporting of his tragic death.

I found myself unable to pray my normal prayers with the same sense of certainty I had always felt.

When I recited the familiar Arabic phrases I had known since childhood, they felt empty, mechanical, devoid of the meaning they had once held.

When I declared that there was no God but Allah and Muhammad was his messenger, I heard Kirk’s voice in my mind proclaiming something different from his sermons.

Christ is Lord. The two declarations couldn’t both be true. Either Jesus was who Christians claimed he was, the son of God, the second person of the Trinity, the Lord of creation, or he was what I had been taught he was, a prophet, a good man, but not divine.

Not the final answer to humanity’s deepest questions. Charlie Kirk had bet his entire life on the first option.

He had lived as if Jesus Christ was indeed the Lord of the universe, proclaiming that truth with unshakable conviction in every speech and interview.

As I sat in my bedroom night after night, replaying those videos over and over in my mind, I began to realize that I was being forced to make the same choice Kirk had made.

I could dismiss his faith as the delusions of a misguided man. Or I could seriously consider the possibility that he had discovered something true and transformative about the nature of God and salvation.

The choice terrified me. Everything I had ever believed about God, about truth, about my own eternal destiny hung in the balance.

But I was beginning to understand that I couldn’t avoid making it much longer. Those words from Kirk’s sermons, Christ is Lord, were demanding an answer from me.

The question was whether I had the courage to give one. Sleep became my enemy.

Night after night, I would lie in bed staring at the ceiling. Kirk’s words from his videos echoing in my mind like a bell that wouldn’t stop ringing.

Christ is Lord. Christ is Lord. Christ is Lord. The declaration had lodged itself so deeply in my consciousness that it seemed to pulse with my heartbeat, breathe with my lungs, think with my thoughts.

I had entered the most terrifying period of my life. A spiritual wrestling match that left me exhausted, confused, and desperately hungry for answers.

I wasn’t sure I was ready to receive. The days blended together in a haze of internal turmoil.

I would go through the motions of my normal routine. Shower, breakfast, commute to work, 8 hours of reviewing financial documents, commute home, dinner, television.

But my mind was elsewhere, grappling with questions that seemed to grow larger and more urgent with each passing hour.

During lunch breaks, I found myself walking to nearby parks where I could be alone with my thoughts.

I would sit on benches watching people go about their ordinary lives, wondering if any of them had ever been faced with the kind of choice that was consuming me.

Did they know how fragile faith could be? Did they understand how quickly certainty could crumble when confronted with truth?

I started researching Christianity in ways I never had before. Not the superficial investigations I had done in the past to find ammunition against Christian beliefs, but genuine inquiry into what Christians actually believed and why they believed it.

I read about the Trinity, about the incarnation, about concepts that my Islamic upbringing had taught me to dismiss as illogical corruptions of monotheistic truth.

But now, instead of looking for flaws to exploit, I found myself trying to understand how could Christians claim that Jesus was both fully God and fully man.

How could they worship one God while believing in three persons? How could they accept that the infinite creator of the universe had become a human baby, lived a human life, died a human death?

The more I studied, the more I realized how little I actually understood about Christian theology.

My previous knowledge had been entirely secondhand, filtered through Islamic apologetics that were designed to refute rather than comprehend.

I had never seriously grappled with Christian claims on their own terms. Never tried to understand what they might mean, if they were actually true.

The intellectual challenge was daunting, but it was nothing compared to the emotional and spiritual chaos I was experiencing.

Every fiber of my being had been shaped by Islamic faith and practice. The five daily prayers, the dietary restrictions, the social bonds with my Muslim community, the sense of identity that came from being part of the UMA.

All of it was threatened by the questions Kirk’s death had awakened in me. I began to dread family gatherings.

Sitting around my parents’ dinner table, listening to the same conversations about politics and community news, I felt like an impostor.

When my father led us in prayers before meals, I found myself going through the motions while my heart wrestled with doubts I couldn’t share.

When my uncles made their usual comments about Christianity being a corrupted religion, I had to bite my tongue to keep from asking questions that would have shocked them.

The isolation was overwhelming. I was surrounded by people who loved me, but I couldn’t tell them about the spiritual battle raging in my heart.

How could I explain that I was beginning to question everything we had been taught about Jesus?

How could I admit that the man we had celebrated shooting had lived a life of faith that was shaking the foundations of my own?

Work became a refuge of sorts, a place where I could focus on numbers and regulations and tax codes, things that were concrete and manageable, unlike the cosmic questions that haunted my personal life.

But even there, I found my concentrations slipping. Colleagues began commenting on my distraction, my unusual quietness, my tendency to stare off into space during meetings.

The worst moments came during prayer times. Five times a day, as I had done since childhood, I would face Mecca and recite the familiar Arabic words.

But now, as I prostrated myself before Allah, I would hear Kirk’s voice from his videos in my memory, proclaiming, “Christ is Lord.”

The two declarations seemed to collide in my mind like opposing forces, each demanding allegiance, each claiming ultimate truth.

I began to feel like I was living two lives. On the surface, I was still Amir the beautiful Muslim son, the successful accountant, the young man who attended Friday prayers and participated in family gatherings and maintained all the external markers of faith.

But underneath I was becoming someone else. Someone haunted by questions. Someone hungry for truth.

Someone beginning to suspect that everything he had believed might be wrong. A few days ago, during what should have been a routine evening prayer, I was in my bedroom having just spread my prayer rug toward Mecca when I found myself unable to begin the familiar recitations.

Instead, I knelt there in silence, overwhelmed by a sense that I was standing at the edge of a cliff with no way back.

For the first time in my adult life, I prayed in English rather than Arabic, and I wasn’t sure who I was praying to.

God, I whispered into the darkness of my room. I don’t know what’s true anymore.

I don’t know who you are or how to find you. But if Jesus is really who Charlie Kirk believed he was, if Christ really is Lord, then I need to know.

I can’t keep living with this uncertainty. Show me the truth, whatever it costs me.

It was a dangerous prayer, and I knew it even as the words left my lips.

I was essentially asking God to demolish my existing faith if it was false, to tear apart my family relationships if necessary, to destroy my comfortable life if that’s what truth required.

But I was desperate enough to ask anyway. The answer didn’t come immediately, but it came powerfully over the next few days.

I found myself compulsively watching more of Kirk’s speeches and sermons, but now I was listening for different things.

Instead of looking for political positions to agree or disagree with, I was trying to understand the source of his conviction about Jesus.

What had he seen or experienced that made him so certain? What did he know that I didn’t?

In one particular sermon I found online, Kirk spoke about his own conversion to Christianity.

He had grown up in a nominally Christian household, he said. But it wasn’t until college that he encountered Jesus as a living reality rather than just a historical figure or cultural tradition.

He described a moment of revelation when the truth of the gospels suddenly became real to him.

When Jesus stopped being an abstract concept and became his personal Lord and Savior. As Kirk described that transformation, something stirred in my chest, a longing I had never felt before, a hunger for the kind of certainty and peace he described.

He spoke about the freedom that came from knowing his sins were forgiven. About the joy of having a personal relationship with the creator of the universe, about the hope that came from knowing his eternal destiny was secure in Christ.

I had never heard anyone talk about God the way Kirk talked about Jesus. In my Islamic upbringing, Allah was distant, unknowable, demanding submission but offering little intimacy.

The idea of having a personal relationship with the divine, of being able to approach God as a loving father rather than just a stern judge was revolutionary to me.

But it was another video that finally broke through my remaining defenses. Someone had uploaded a compilation of Kirk’s statements about forgiveness and redemption, including clips where he talked about how Jesus had transformed his own heart, freeing him from hatred and bitterness, and filling him with love even for his enemies.

As I watched Kirk speak about loving his enemies, about praying for those who persecuted him, about the way Christ’s love had changed his heart, I was confronted with the devastating irony of my own position.

Here was a man I had hated for years speaking about love and forgiveness while I had been consumed with anger and resentment.

He had been proclaiming peace and reconciliation while I had been celebrating his death. Who was really following the way of God?

The man who had lived proclaiming Christ’s lordship and love or the community that celebrated his violent death with memes and mockery.

The question haunted me, but it also began to illuminate something I had never seen clearly before.

Throughout my life, I had been taught that Islam was a religion of peace. But my experience of Muslim community had often been characterized by anger, resentment, and hatred for perceived enemies.

We talked constantly about jihad and resistance, about standing against the Kufar, about the necessity of opposing those who opposed us.

But Kirk, who we had labeled as our enemy, had spent his life talking about love, forgiveness, transformation, and hope.

Even his political positions, which I was beginning to understand better, seemed motivated more by love for his country and concern for its future than by hatred for any particular group.

I began to wonder if I had been on the wrong side all along. The thought terrified me.

If Kirk had been right about the nature of truth and salvation, if Jesus really was the way to God rather than Muhammad, if Christianity rather than Islam offered the path to eternal life, then everything about my identity, my family, my community, my future was at stake.

I started having what I can only describe as spiritual encounters during this period. Moments when I would be alone in my flat and suddenly feel an overwhelming sense of presence as if someone was in the room with me.

Times when I would be walking to work and feel an inexplicable sense of love and acceptance washing over me.

Instances when I would wake up in the middle of the night with Kirk’s words from his sermons echoing in my mind.

But now accompanied by a voice that seemed to whisper, “Come and see.” The most powerful of these experiences happened just last night.

I had skipped prayers at the mosque for the first time in years, claiming illness when my father called to ask why I wasn’t there.

Instead, I was alone in my flat, wrestling with questions that seemed too large for my mind to contain.

I had been reading online about Christian conversion, trying to understand what it meant to give your life to Christ or accept Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior.

The language was foreign to me, but I was beginning to grasp that it involved more than just intellectual acceptance of certain facts.

It seemed to require a fundamental reorientation of the heart, a decision to trust Jesus with everything, past, present, and future.

As I sat in my living room that evening, I felt an overwhelming sense of being called to make that decision.

It wasn’t an audible voice, but it was unmistakable nonetheless. A presence that seemed to fill the room.

A love that seemed to surround me. An invitation that demanded a response. I found myself on my knees, not facing Mecca, but looking up toward heaven.

Tears streaming down my face as I wrestled with the most important decision of my life.

Everything I had ever been, everything I had ever believed, everything I had ever hoped for hung in the balance.

Jesus, I whispered, the name feeling strange on my lips after years of referring to him only as EA, a mere prophet.

Jesus, if you are really who Charlie Kirk believed you were, if you are really Lord, then I need you to save me.

I need you to forgive me for the hatred I’ve carried, for the years I spent opposing you without even knowing it.

I need you to make me new.” The prayer felt both terrifying and liberating. I was burning bridges with my past, potentially destroying relationships with everyone I loved, risking everything I had ever known for the sake of a truth I was only beginning to understand.

But as I knelt there in surrender, something extraordinary happened. The crushing weight of guilt and confusion that had been pressing down on me for weeks suddenly lifted.

The frantic questions that had been torturing my mind grew quiet. The sense of being torn between two worlds gave way to a profound peace that seemed to settle into my bones.

For the first time since Kirk’s death, I felt like I could breathe freely. I remained on my knees for what felt like hours, crying and praying and feeling waves of love and acceptance wash over me.

I thought about Kirk’s life, about his unshakable conviction in the face of opposition, about the way his faith had transformed him from whatever he might have been into someone who could love his enemies and live proclaiming truth.

I understood now why his words had hit me so powerfully. Kirk’s proclamation of Christ is Lord throughout his life wasn’t just a repeated phrase in his sermons.

It was the truth that the universe was built on. The reality that every human heart was designed to recognize, the answer to every question I had ever had about meaning and purpose and eternal life.

As the night wore on, I began to feel a joy unlike anything I had ever experienced.

Not the temporary happiness that comes from success or pleasure, but a deep abiding sense of rightness with the world, of being exactly where I was supposed to be, of having found the truth I had been unconsciously seeking all my life.

By dawn, I knew that everything had changed. I was still Amir Hussein, still a 27-year-old accountant living in Birmingham.

But I was also something I had never been before. A follower of Jesus Christ.

Someone who had heard his call and responded with surrender. The challenges that lay ahead were enormous.

I would have to tell my family about my conversion, knowing it might cost me their love and acceptance.

I would have to find a new community, a new way of understanding myself and my place in the world.

I would have to learn how to live as a Christian in a context that had always been defined by Islamic faith and practice.

But as I watched the sunrise through my bedroom window that morning, I felt ready for whatever came next.

Charlie Kirk had shown me what it looked like to live with unshakable conviction about Christ’s lordship.

Now it was my turn to discover what that conviction could do in and through my own life.

The man I had hated had become the instrument of salvation. The enemy I celebrated shooting had lived a life proclaiming the truth that set me free.

The faith I had initially dismissed as the belief of a bigot had become the foundation of my new life in Christ.

Christ is Lord, I whispered as the morning light filled my room. This time the words didn’t come from memory of someone else’s conviction.

They came from the depths of my own transformed heart. As I write these words on this Wednesday evening, September 17th, 2025, exactly one week after Charlie Kirk’s death, my hands are still trembling from what has happened to me.

The transformation in my heart is so fresh, so overwhelming that I can barely comprehend it myself.

Yet I feel compelled to share this testimony while every detail is still vivid, while the emotions are still raw, while the miracle of what God has done in my life is still taking my breath away.

Yesterday, Wednesday evening, I made the decision that changed everything. I had spent the entire day in a state of spiritual torment, replaying Kirk’s sermons over and over in my mind, wrestling with questions that seemed too large for my understanding.

The weight of choosing between everything I had ever believed and the truth that seemed to be calling to me was crushing.

I felt like I was standing at the edge of a cliff, knowing that once I jumped, there would be no going back.

That evening, alone in my flat, I found myself on my knees, not facing Mecca as I had done thousands of times before, but looking up toward heaven, desperate for answers that only God could provide.

Jesus,” I whispered, the name feeling both foreign and familiar on my lips. “Jesus, if you are really who Charlie Kirk believed you were, if you are really Lord, then I surrender.

I need you to save me. I need you to forgive me for the hatred I’ve carried, for the years I spent opposing you without even knowing it.

I need you to make me new.” The moment I spoke those words, something extraordinary happened.

The crushing weight that had been pressing down on me for a week suddenly lifted.

The frantic questions that had been torturing my mind grew quiet. The sense of being torn between two worlds gave way to a profound peace that seemed to settle into my very bones.

I remained on my knees for hours crying and praying and feeling waves of love and acceptance wash over me like nothing I had ever experienced.

For the first time in my life, I understood what it meant to have a personal relationship with the living God.

Not the distant demanding Allah of my Islamic upbringing, but the loving father who had sent his son to die for my sins.

I thought about Kirk’s life, about his unshakable conviction in the face of opposition, about the way his faith had sustained him even in his final moments.

I understood now why his words had hit me so powerfully. Kirk’s proclamation of Christ is Lord wasn’t just a repeated theme in his teachings.

It was the truth that the universe was built on. The reality that every human heart was designed to recognize, the answer to every question I had ever had about meaning and purpose and eternal life.

This morning, I woke up feeling like a completely new person. The emptiness that had characterized my prayers for so many years was replaced by a sense of intimate communion with God.

The fear of divine judgment that had always lurked beneath my religious observances gave way to the incredible peace of knowing my sins were forgiven through Christ’s sacrifice on the cross.

But now comes the hardest part. Learning to live as this new creation while surrounded by the remnants of my old life.

I know that telling my family will be devastating. I know that my community will reject me.

I know that everything familiar and comfortable in my life is about to be shaken to its foundations.

But I also know that I cannot go back to living a lie. Cannot pretend to believe something I no longer believe.

Cannot deny the truth that has set me free. Tomorrow I plan to visit a church for the first time in my life.

I need to find people who can help me understand what it means to follow Jesus, who can teach me how to live as a Christian, who can support me through the challenges I know are coming.

I also plan to tell my family soon, probably this week. I’m terrified of their reaction, but I’m also convinced that this is what God is calling me to do.

Charlie Kirk showed me what it looked like to live for Christ without fear of the consequences.

Now it’s my turn to find that same courage. The man I once hated has become the instrument of my salvation.

The enemy I celebrated shooting lived a life proclaiming the truth that set me free.

The faith I initially dismissed as the belief of a dying man has become the foundation of my new life in Christ.

As I finish writing this testimony, I can hear Kirk’s voice in my memory one more time from his sermons.

Christ is Lord. But now, instead of haunting me with questions, those words fill me with unshakable conviction.

They are no longer just his words. They are my words, my belief, my eternal hope.

Christ is Lord. He was Lord in every moment of Charlie Kirk’s life. He was Lord when I surrendered my heart to him last night.

He is Lord as I write these words. And he will be Lord forever regardless of what it costs me to follow him.

If you’ve read or listened this far, if my story has stirred something in your heart, if you’re beginning to wonder whether the Jesus that Charlie Kirk lived for might indeed be Lord, then I want you to know that the same God who transformed my heart just yesterday is calling to yours right now.

You don’t have to understand everything about theology or doctrine to respond to that call.

You just have to be willing to consider that Jesus Christ might indeed be who he claimed to be.

The way, the truth, and the life, the only path to the Father, the Lord of Lords and King of Kings.

It’s been exactly 1 week since Charlie Kirk was shot for his faith. It’s been less than 24 hours since I chose to live for that same faith.

The journey ahead is uncertain, but one thing I know beyond any doubt, Christ is Lord, and that changes everything.